My whole warehouse is 14 people. Our attendance system is me yelling "everybody here?" in the group chat every morning. Latecomers voluntarily drop a $5 red envelope in the chat, and we're done.
But last fall I toured a 500-person warehouse in Ontario, and their HR handed me a one-pager: a warehouse attendance point system policy. Tardies worth this many points, absences worth that many, hit the cap and you're fired — all spelled out. My first thought: they've literally put a price tag on being late. I've spent the better part of a year digging into how this thing works, so today I'm breaking it down — a small-warehouse owner studying the big players' HR playbook. Partly for fun, partly in case I ever need it.
What the big guys' point system actually looks like: tardies, absences, and the price of each
The core of a no-fault attendance point system is one sentence: no excuses, only behavior. Burst pipe or overslept — the system doesn't care. Late is late, absent is absent. Sounds cold, but when you're managing hundreds of people, a supervisor listening to 200 tardy excuses a day would never get a shift scheduled.
Here's a typical point scale, adapted from a publicly available HR template (every company's actual policy differs — the big warehouses only get more detailed):
| Incident | Points |
|---|---|
| Tardy under 20 minutes | 1 |
| Tardy 20+ minutes | 2 |
| Unexcused absence | 3 |
| Leaving early without approval | 3 |
| No-call no-show | 5 |
And the discipline ladder: 10 points for a verbal warning, 20 for a written warning, 25 for a one-week suspension, 30 for two weeks, 50 for termination. It's like a video game played in reverse — max out your score and it's game over.
The Ontario HR manager told me about one of their pickers: 9 tardies and 2 no-call no-shows in a year — 9 + 10 = 19 points, sitting right on the written-warning line. Before peak season he came to his supervisor himself: "My points are getting dangerous, can I switch to night shift?" That's the genius of the system — it turns "the boss wants to fire me" into "I maxed out my own points." Hard to argue with your own scorecard.
Rolling windows and the termination line: how a point system lets points expire
If points accumulated forever, nobody would survive. So any serious warehouse attendance point system policy has two companion designs.
First, the rolling window. The most common setup is 12 months: 3 points earned in March 2025 drop off in March 2026. Some companies are tougher on new hires — the first 90 days get a separate, lower termination threshold, politely called "the mutual evaluation period."
Second, the point-reduction path. One company's policy from a published court case stuck with me: automatic termination above 11 points, but 30 days of perfect attendance earns points back. Translation: you get a path to redemption, but you can't coast.
My warehouse? Points don't exist. We run on "the boss's memory system" — I just remember who shows up late a lot. Honestly, with 14 people that works. With 140, I'd be lost. That's the real value of a point system: it's not about managing people, it's about outsourcing the boss's memory.

The legal tripwires: FMLA and paid sick leave are the two craters in a point system policy
Everything above is tactics. This section is survival. Here's the great irony of no-fault systems: they look the fairest — no excuses, everyone treated the same — but they're actually the legally riskiest attendance policy around. Because some absences, the law says, you may not score.
Start with FMLA, the federal Family and Medical Leave Act. The U.S. Department of Labor spells it out: employers with 50 or more employees, an employee with 12 months of service, 1,250 hours worked in the past 12 months, at a worksite with 50+ employees within 75 miles — those workers get 12 weeks of unpaid, job-protected leave per year. Absences taken as FMLA leave may not earn a single point. The DOL even issued an opinion letter on it: freezing someone's point total during FMLA leave is fine, but you can't use it to strip benefits they'd otherwise have earned.
Then there's California paid sick leave. Under SB 616, effective January 1, 2024, California employers must provide at least 5 days or 40 hours of paid sick leave per year, accruing at one hour per 30 hours worked. An employee calls in sick by the book and you slap 3 points on them anyway — the labor department calls that retaliation, and the penalty dwarfs whatever the absence cost you.
A warehouse owner I know in California (about 50 people) learned this the hard way: he scored an employee's sick-leave absence, the employee filed with the labor department, and it cost him a pile of attorney fees to make it go away. "But I was following the policy!" he told me. I said your policy can be no-fault all it wants — it's still smaller than the law.
It gets worse. According to public reporting, a national retailer's no-fault policy drew a class-action lawsuit from workers arguing the "no questions asked" system disadvantaged pregnant employees. The EEOC has also gone after the clash between these policies and the ADA — disability-related absences may require reasonable accommodation, not a one-size-fits-all point.
So here's the iron rule: your point system can be no-fault, but legally protected leave must be fault — carved out and exempt, every time. State rules change constantly, so check with your local labor department for the latest requirements rather than treating the numbers in this article as gospel.
Small-warehouse street smarts vs. the corporate point-system playbook: I picked a third way
| Small-warehouse way | Corporate point system | |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | Nearly zero — one shout in the chat | HR team + attendance software + legal fees |
| Fairness | Depends on the boss's mood and memory | Equal numbers for everyone |
| Legal risk | Low — few people, easy conversations | High — one misstep, one lawsuit |
| Right size | Under 30 people | 200+ people |
| Side effect | Veterans trade on goodwill, newbies read the room | Controls bodies, not hearts — turnover stays high anyway |
Summer 2023, our loader Lao Chen showed up late three days straight. By big-warehouse math, that's 3 points on the board. Our solution: he lost his $200 perfect-attendance bonus for the month, then dropped a $50 red envelope in the group chat for everyone's sodas, and it was over. Lao Chen is still our best loader — during peak season he does the work of two. Points or red envelopes? All I can say is: with 14 people, red envelopes work better.
But I did learn something. We now have a one-page "budget point system" posted in the break room: three tardies lose the attendance bonus, one no-call no-show gets a formal talk, two and you're out. Nothing as dramatic as a 50-point termination line, but everything that matters is there in black and white. Saves a lot of arguing.
Small warehouses have their own way of surviving. The day I hit 200 people, I'll hire the HR, buy the software, and afford the lawyers — and then I'll build my own warehouse attendance point system policy. Until then: stay alive, and get the freight out the door.
By Xiao Ma, Small Warehouse Owner






